<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Stage 675, Metamorphosis of a WIP: Gilding the Lily</title>
	<atom:link href="http://darteboard.com/2010/01/30/stage-675-metamorphasis-of-a-wip-gilding-the-lily/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://darteboard.com/2010/01/30/stage-675-metamorphasis-of-a-wip-gilding-the-lily/</link>
	<description>Art, Criticism, Snark and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Apr 2013 15:31:26 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://darteboard.com/2010/01/30/stage-675-metamorphasis-of-a-wip-gilding-the-lily/#comment-7844</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 18:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darteboard.com/?p=6715#comment-7844</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know what you mean. I am doing that with shape on the sides of an octohedron. Rather than spend a week building on it, then hating it, this Sketchup program allows me to visualize it, hate it, and save on materials. Right now I don&#039;t like the drama or the rhythm of the waves. The depth is too subtle. And so, I&#039;ll &quot;carve&quot; them a little deeper, and perhaps lower the frequency.

http://virtualsculptureakottenstette.blogspot.com/2010/01/preliminary-sketch-of-octahedron.html]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know what you mean. I am doing that with shape on the sides of an octohedron. Rather than spend a week building on it, then hating it, this Sketchup program allows me to visualize it, hate it, and save on materials. Right now I don&#8217;t like the drama or the rhythm of the waves. The depth is too subtle. And so, I&#8217;ll &#8220;carve&#8221; them a little deeper, and perhaps lower the frequency.</p>
<p><a href="http://virtualsculptureakottenstette.blogspot.com/2010/01/preliminary-sketch-of-octahedron.html" rel="nofollow">http://virtualsculptureakottenstette.blogspot.com/2010/01/preliminary-sketch-of-octahedron.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ssstephg</title>
		<link>http://darteboard.com/2010/01/30/stage-675-metamorphasis-of-a-wip-gilding-the-lily/#comment-7843</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[ssstephg]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:32:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darteboard.com/?p=6715#comment-7843</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[yeah, i needed to bring in some grit.  it&#039;s still not finished.  that&#039;s the thing tho.  overdone to one person can be not even close to finished to another.  i don&#039;t call something finished until it feels resolved to me.  plenty of times, or maybe even usually, that means a host of people &quot;liked it better before&quot; but, for me, there&#039;s no point leaving it if i haven&#039;t brought it to a point where i feel satisfied that whatever i was working through with the particular piece has been resolved.  so it&#039;s work and rework and scrape and apply until a satisfactory balance is found.  for me, it&#039;s too easy to find a stage where something is pretty and just stop there.  that rarely feels right.  there&#039;s rarely enough tension or interest at that point.

btw, thank you but you know that ain&#039;t no way to earn a prize, my friend. ;)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah, i needed to bring in some grit.  it&#8217;s still not finished.  that&#8217;s the thing tho.  overdone to one person can be not even close to finished to another.  i don&#8217;t call something finished until it feels resolved to me.  plenty of times, or maybe even usually, that means a host of people &#8220;liked it better before&#8221; but, for me, there&#8217;s no point leaving it if i haven&#8217;t brought it to a point where i feel satisfied that whatever i was working through with the particular piece has been resolved.  so it&#8217;s work and rework and scrape and apply until a satisfactory balance is found.  for me, it&#8217;s too easy to find a stage where something is pretty and just stop there.  that rarely feels right.  there&#8217;s rarely enough tension or interest at that point.</p>
<p>btw, thank you but you know that ain&#8217;t no way to earn a prize, my friend. <img src='http://s1.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://darteboard.com/2010/01/30/stage-675-metamorphasis-of-a-wip-gilding-the-lily/#comment-7842</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 Jan 2010 17:19:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://darteboard.com/?p=6715#comment-7842</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well...it&#039;s certainly less saturated, but in exchange it&#039;s now got grit!
How does one know when the process has been overdone? How do you control the application of it?

I like it, but for different reasons now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well&#8230;it&#8217;s certainly less saturated, but in exchange it&#8217;s now got grit!<br />
How does one know when the process has been overdone? How do you control the application of it?</p>
<p>I like it, but for different reasons now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
