You Must Destroy to Create.

(That’s spoken with an monotone eastern European accent.)

There has been talk of the individual approach to process and time management this week on the blog. It was addressed in a post from Tuesday.

Lately I’ve really been busted trying to manage my time in the studio. Its a drag with a capital g.

I work in a variety of ways. My monotypes, due to the nature of the medium, are produced rather quickly, in a matter of hours or less. Sometimes a painting will take but a relatively short time depending on the energy, the conceptual circumstances and how efficiently my subconscious is doing the thinking.
Other times, a piece or pieces will go through the whole “create and destroy and create” exercise and may take weeks or months to be realized. Here is an example of a painting I started a few weeks ago which has -and will – go through a metamorphosis as a dialogue of sorts. The conversation is all an adventure and will go through so many changes I may not quite know where it will end. The piece was started as a part of an ongoing series of paintings connected to the idea of the “purdah” and its related symbology and meanings.

I started it as a straight figure, but I unfortunately don’t have documentation from that first stage. Then I furiously worked into it.
a stage from a few weeks ago:

Unfinished Purdah

It wasn’t working for me; it was at a narrative and formal stage I wasn’t satisfied with. so I continued.

unfinished purdah version 2

and another stage

unfinished purdah version 3

Here it is staring at me now:

unfin purdah version 4

I wanted to push the form, the abstraction and the marks somewhere else. I’ll sit with this a little. it might be finished; I’ll keep you updated. Cause I know you care.

9 Responses to “You Must Destroy to Create.”

  1. It’s interesting to see that someone of your talent and level of experience sometimes struggles to reach your destination, too.

  2. i’m imagining Andre Codrescu’s voice as i read this post. no idea why.

  3. Interesting…
    This progression touches heavily on the factor of whether the “process” or the “product” is the more important issue for the artist.

    • Yes, for some the end is more important than the means. That doesn’t compute for me. The process is always where the excitement is and when its finished, eh. On to the next.

  4. I like Codrescu. But my voice is much deeper.

Leave a Reply